[Spacecadets] Response from Board of Directors

[Christopher A W Zapotocky]

Okay unfortunate wording on my part. Point 3 of proposal 1. I apologize for the confusion. (Each point is itself an additional proposal so that is how I was using that).

Okay so just clarify point 3. I can see the confusion now. It was meant as from the wall to 9 feet out...or basically where the current tables have been placed. I can do a map.

Thank you for the clarification on that (and my own unspecific wording).

Christopher Zapotocky
________________________________________
From: John Benedetto [john.benedetto at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 8:16 PM
To: Christopher A W Zapotocky
Cc: Space Utilization; QueLab Hackerspace
Subject: Re: [Spacecadets] Response from Board of Directors

Chris,

Can you please re-send proposal 3?  I can only find two proposals in previous emails.

However, proposal 1, point 3 says "We proposed that this space be established between the roll-up door and the fire exit along the south wall of the Annex. An offset of 9 feet from the wall would provide ample space for work benches."

There was some confusion as to the exact meaning of this, some thought it meant the rental space would START nine feet out from the wall (basically in the middle of the floor), while others thought it would extend from the wall and nine feet north.  Thus the request for a map of the proposed space for rent.

Thanks.

JT

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Christopher A W Zapotocky <czapo at unm.edu<mailto:czapo at unm.edu>> wrote:
Dear Quelab Board of Directors,

I appreciate the timely response and the thorough consideration of the proposals. I would like to point out briefly that in the Annex proposal, the space to be rented is defined in proposal 3. Is the board requesting a more formal definition of that space?